home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: peer-news.britain.eu.net!demon!spence-n.demon.co.uk
- From: neil@spence-n.demon.co.uk (Neil)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.audio
- Subject: Re: Bars&Pipes
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 18:09:17 GMT
- Message-ID: <822938961.11726@spence-n.demon.co.uk>
- References: <1207.6602T900T2019@oslonett.no>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: spence-n.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: spence-n.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- hekr@oslonett.no (Henning Kristiansen) wrote:
-
- >All coders out there!
-
- >This is serious ( after testing programs like "Cakewalk" and "Cubase" ) on PC
- >I must say that "Bars&Pipes" is 1 step ahead!, It really is alot more easy to
- >work with ( It's really not the sequencers on PC that fails but windows! )
-
- >This is probably why "Bars&Pipes" is better!.
-
- Sorry, I simply cannot agree.
-
- I really do not want to start the Amiga vs PC debate. Because I really
- Lurrrv the Amiga, but PC sequencing packages are now streets ahead.
-
- I run a small studio in the UK We have Cakewalk 3.0 on PC (486 DX100
- Windows 95) and Bars and Pipes on 68030 Amiga
-
- I have used Cubase and Trax.
-
- The Amiga may be a cheaper and have a lower entry price but for
- features and user interface the PC packages leave them standing. My
- productivity is much higher when using the PC packages and they get in
- the way of making music much less.
-
- The tools are great but a lot of the tool stuff is a standard features
- in Cakewalk and much easier to access.
-
- An that coloured, chunky interface is horrible. But then each to his
- own.
-
- B&P will be used because it is (a)Free and (b)The only pro package for
- the Amiga.
-
- I agree totally with your comments re:Micro$oft. But I doubt they will
- make the code available as they cannot make money from that. All the
- crap from Bill Gates about enabling people when Blue Ribbons Amiga
- operation has been killed. Doesn't sound very enabling to me, more
- like standard corporate Bull S**T.
-
-